Lemberg Solutions vs WebbyLab: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of WebbyLab (4.2/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for RFPs needing hardware and firmware scoped under one vendor. WebbyLab is the stronger option for RFPs bundling hardware selection, firmware, and the connected application layer. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs WebbyLab: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | WebbyLab |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2011 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Kyiv, Ukraine (also London, UK) |
| Team size | 200+ | 120+ |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | In-house hardware lab plus NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status covers both the board bring-up and firmware line items in a single SOW | Full-cycle delivery from hardware selection through firmware and the connected application layer under one team |
| Pricing model | Firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation | Project-based full-cycle IoT engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Azure RTOS | C, C++, IoT Connectivity Protocols |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing & Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive | IoT hardware products, Fintech, E-commerce |
Lemberg Solutions vs WebbyLab: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions was founded in 2007 in Lviv, Ukraine and has grown to a 200+ person team with additional offices in Hamburg, London, and Kraków. Its engagement scope runs from RTOS and bare-metal firmware architecture through embedded GUI work, secure boot and OTA update design, and hardware validation in its own lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and hardware-in-the-loop testing capability. Direct partnership status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip, plus ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications, gives a procurement team the kind of verifiable vendor-qualification evidence an RFP typically asks for, and the company transfers full IP and source code rights to the client on delivery.
WebbyLab
WebbyLab was founded in 2011 by Anton Morozov and Viktor Turskyi and operates from Kyiv and London with more than 120 engineers across hardware, firmware, and software disciplines. The firm's stated full-cycle scope runs from hardware selection through firmware development and the cloud or mobile application layer, with IoT and embedded systems named as a core specialty and Fortune 500 clients cited among its customer base. That full-cycle framing fits an RFP that bundles the connected-device backend into the same scope as the firmware itself.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs WebbyLab
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | WebbyLab |
|---|---|---|
| Firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hardware / PCB co-design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Functional safety / certification | ✓ | ✗ |
| Defense / aerospace credentials | ✗ | ✗ |
| Medical device firmware | ✗ | ✗ |
| Secure firmware updates | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT connectivity | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs WebbyLab
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | WebbyLab |
|---|---|---|
| C | ✓ | ✓ |
| C++ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| PCB Design | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
| MISRA C | ✓ | N/A |
| ITAR | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| ASIL | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs WebbyLab
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | WebbyLab |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Firmware consulting, Design-phase engagement, Full development lifecycle, Staff augmentation | Project-based full-cycle development |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs WebbyLab
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | WebbyLab |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging), Transportation & Logistics | IoT hardware products, Fintech, E-commerce |
| Best use cases | RFP requiring hardware validation, firmware development, and compliance documentation in one response, Secure OTA update infrastructure for a fleet of connected devices already in the field | Full-cycle IoT RFP from hardware selection through firmware and its companion mobile app, Embedded firmware program requiring cloud integration under one vendor |
| Typical project type | Firmware consulting | Project-based full-cycle development |
Lemberg Solutions vs WebbyLab: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | In-house hardware lab covers board bring-up and HIL validation, a line item many pure-firmware vendors subcontract out |
| + | ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications give a procurement team documented evidence for vendor qualification checklists |
| + | Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status is independently verifiable against each vendor's own partner directory |
| + | Engagement models span consulting, design-phase, full lifecycle, and staff augmentation, matching how most RFPs are structured |
| + | Full IP and source code transfer on delivery removes a common negotiation point in vendor contracts |
| - | Does not run mass production in-house, so a manufacturing line item still needs a separate contractor |
| - | Does not submit regulatory certification filings on the client's behalf, only the supporting technical documentation |
| - | No published minimum engagement figure, so budget fit for a specific RFP needs a scoping call |
| WebbyLab | |
|---|---|
| + | Full-cycle scope from hardware selection through the connected application layer reduces the vendor count an RFP needs to coordinate |
| + | 120-plus engineers gives more concurrent-program capacity than most boutique competing bidders |
| + | Fortune 500 client relationships indicate prior experience with large-organization procurement processes |
| + | 14 years of operating history under its original two founders |
| - | IoT and embedded is one specialty alongside fintech and e-commerce work, not the firm's sole focus |
| - | Specific named case studies with verifiable project details are limited in public materials |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement threshold |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: RFP requiring hardware validation, firmware development, and compliance documentation in one response.
In-house hardware lab plus NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status covers both the board bring-up and firmware line items in a single SOW. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing & Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive.
Who should choose WebbyLab?
A typical fit: full-cycle IoT RFP from hardware selection through firmware and its companion mobile app.
Full-cycle delivery from hardware selection through firmware and the connected application layer under one team. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in IoT hardware products, Fintech, E-commerce.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs WebbyLab
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs WebbyLab (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs WebbyLab
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | WebbyLab fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| RFP requiring hardware validation, firmware development, and compliance documentation in one response | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Secure OTA update infrastructure for a fleet of connected devices already in the field | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Full-cycle IoT RFP from hardware selection through firmware and its companion mobile app | Limited | Strong | WebbyLab |
| Embedded firmware program requiring cloud integration under one vendor | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs WebbyLab
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Firmware projects. In-house hardware lab plus NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status covers both the board bring-up and firmware line items in a single SOW.
WebbyLab (4.2/5) is worth a look if you need embedded firmware program requiring cloud integration under one vendor. If your situation matches that, WebbyLab is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs WebbyLab FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than WebbyLab?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: in-house hardware lab covers board bring-up and HIL validation, a line item many pure-firmware vendors subcontract out. WebbyLab's strongest advantage: full-cycle scope from hardware selection through the connected application layer reduces the vendor count an RFP needs to coordinate.
How do Lemberg Solutions and WebbyLab differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation pricing. WebbyLab uses project-based full-cycle iot engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or WebbyLab?
Lemberg Solutions is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each service provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and WebbyLab?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: in-house hardware lab plus NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status covers both the board bring-up and firmware line items in a single SOW. WebbyLab's primary differentiator is: full-cycle delivery from hardware selection through firmware and the connected application layer under one team. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 120+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging) vs IoT hardware products, Fintech).
Verify all details directly with each service provider before making a decision.